10 Rare Android Apps Worth Finding

Updated September 2026 · every listing re-read on 6 September 2026, the Organic Maps rating corrected, seven review counts refreshed, and the two F-Droid entries now quote what F-Droid actually publishes

Our answer
  • Catima is our pick to try first because its Google Play listing, read 6 September 2026, is free with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label at 4.8 stars from 1,821 reviews, on a data safety card that declares no data collected.
  • KeePassDX is our pick for anything that holds data you care about because its listing, read 6 September 2026, says it requires no Internet connection, declares no data collected, and carries no ads label and no in-app purchases, at 4.2 stars from 4,983 reviews.
  • Thunder is our genuinely obscure pick because it is the only app here at a 10,000+ install band, 4.5 stars from 198 reviews on a listing read 6 September 2026, with the caveat that the listing was last updated 7 January 2026.
Data checked: 6 September 2026. Checked 6 September 2026 against each app's own listing, named in its section · full breakdown below.
How we verify. Two catalogues, and every figure names its source. The eight Play apps are checked against their own Google Play listings: rating and review count, the install band, the price, the Contains ads label, the data safety card and the store update date, and every claim this page attributes to a listing is read again in that listing's own description. Phonograph Plus and Seal are checked against their F-Droid pages: name, summary, licence, current version, the date it was added, and any Anti-Feature flags. F-Droid publishes no rating, no review or install count, no price and no Contains ads label, so this page prints none of them. What GitHub says about the two F-Droid projects, and which Play apps also appear on F-Droid under which package id, was read on 8 August 2026 and is carried with that date rather than re-read. The one screenshot is our own emulator capture, dated in its caption; it shows a first launch and nothing more. Nothing here rests on our own use of the apps. Last full pass: 6 September 2026, repeated quarterly.

Ten apps that sit outside the charts, compared on what a store page can actually prove: install band, ads, in-app purchases and what each one declares in its Play data safety section. Two of them are not on Google Play, which is stated rather than glossed. More in our app store guides.

Why good Android apps stay out of the charts

The Play Store rewards momentum. An app with a sharp idea and a few hundred downloads rarely surfaces next to one with a marketing budget, because the ranking that decides what you see is built largely from the attention an app already has. That is a fact about the ranking system rather than about the apps, and it is why a category's best tool is often nowhere near its top ten.

The pattern in this list is consistent: the apps with the fewest reviews are usually the ones doing a single job properly, with no account to create and nothing to upgrade to. Several of them are also on F-Droid, which builds and signs apps from source and has no popularity ranking at all, so browsing it by category surfaces different names than the Play charts ever will.

The ten apps, with what each one collects

Ten apps, each with the figures from its own listing and one blunt drawback. Two are not on Google Play and say so instead of carrying invented numbers.

Catima · loyalty cards as barcodes

Loyalty cards as scannable barcodes

4.8 stars from 1,821 reviews · 100,000+ installs · free · no in-app purchases · listing updated 28 August 2026 · by Sylvia van Os · Contains ads: No · checked 6 September 2026

Google Play listing · 4.8 (1,821) · read 6 September 2026

Catima turns a wallet full of plastic loyalty cards into barcodes your phone can show at the till, and it is the app on this page to try first: free, no in-app purchases, no Contains ads label, and a data safety card that says no data shared with third parties and no data collected, read 6 September 2026. It sits at 4.8 stars from 1,821 reviews, a top score here but from a small crowd. The blunt bit: some older terminals cannot read a screen at all, so one physical card is still worth carrying.

Its developer puts it plainly on the listing: “Avoid spying with very few permissions. No Internet access and no ads.” (Google Play, read 6 September 2026).

Also published on F-Droid under the same package id, me.hackerchick.catima.

The capture below, dated 18 August 2026 in its caption, shows the first launch: an empty card list that says to use the plus button to add a card, or to import from the menu, with no account wall, no consent dialog and no advertisement in front of it.

Catima on Android, The empty card list on first launch.
Screenshots of Catima by Sylvia van Os, captured on our own emulator on 18 August 2026. Tap a shot to enlarge.
X
Catima, The empty card list on first launch.
The empty card list on first launch
Swipe to browse · tap X to close
  • Good: Free with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label, on a data safety card that declares no data collected
  • Good: 4.8 stars from 1,821 reviews, a top score on this page
  • Good: Its own listing says no Internet access, which is a checkable claim rather than a promise
  • Con: Some older terminals cannot read a screen at all, so one physical card is still worth carrying
  • Con: A 4.8 built on 1,821 reviews is a small crowd, and the score can move
  • Con: No Internet access by design also means no cloud copy: the export in its settings is the only backup you get

Back to the comparison table

Organic Maps · offline hiking and walking directions

Offline maps and navigation

3.7 stars from 22,012 reviews · 5,000,000+ installs · free · no in-app purchases · listing updated 27 August 2026 · by Organic Maps · Contains ads: No · checked 6 September 2026

Google Play listing · 3.7 (22,012) · read 6 September 2026

Organic Maps downloads whole regions and then navigates without a connection, which is the entire point of it. Free, no in-app purchases, no Contains ads label, and a data safety card that says no data collected, read 6 September 2026. The blunt bit comes in two parts: at 5,000,000+ installs it is the least obscure pick on the page, so treat it as a good app you may have skipped rather than a discovery, and at 3.7 stars from 22,012 reviews it is the lowest rated app here.

Its own description states that the app works offline, search and navigation included, and that its map data is OpenStreetMap, volunteer made (Google Play, read 6 September 2026).

Also published on F-Droid under the same package id, app.organicmaps.

  • Good: Works offline, search and navigation included, by its own description
  • Good: Free with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label, and its data safety card declares no data collected
  • Good: Listing updated 27 August 2026, so it is actively maintained on the store
  • Con: 3.7 stars from 22,012 reviews, the lowest rating on this page
  • Con: 5,000,000+ installs make it the least obscure pick here
  • Con: Its map data is OpenStreetMap, volunteer made by its own description, so coverage varies by place

Back to the comparison table

Olauncher · a home screen with no icons

Text-only minimal home screen

4.8 stars from 80,516 reviews · 1,000,000+ installs · free · no in-app purchases · listing updated 2 September 2026 · by Digital Minimalism · Contains ads: No · checked 6 September 2026

Google Play listing · 4.8 (80,516) · read 6 September 2026

Olauncher replaces the icon grid with a short text list, deliberately dull, which is what makes it work on screen time. Free, no in-app purchases, no Contains ads label, and a data safety card that says no data collected, read 6 September 2026, at 4.8 stars from 80,516 reviews, the second largest review count on this page. The blunt bit: jarring on day one if you navigate by colour and position, and 1,000,000+ installs put it well past obscure.

Its description, read 6 September 2026, states no data collection and an open source licence, and the app is also published on F-Droid under the same package id, app.olauncher.

  • Good: 4.8 stars from 80,516 reviews, the second largest review count on this page
  • Good: Free with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label, and its data safety card declares no data collected
  • Good: Listing updated 2 September 2026, the second newest store update here
  • Con: Jarring on day one if you navigate by colour and position
  • Con: 1,000,000+ installs put it well past obscure
  • Con: Its listing leads with press and social media trophies, so read the feature list rather than the praise

Back to the comparison table

Aves Gallery · photos sorted by place and tag

Fast gallery with map and tag views

4.3 stars from 4,171 reviews · 100,000+ installs · free · no in-app purchases · listing updated 27 July 2026 · by Thibault Deckers · Contains ads: No · checked 6 September 2026

Google Play listing · 4.3 (4,171) · read 6 September 2026

Aves is a quick photo viewer that groups shots by location and tag using the data already inside the files. Free, no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label, read 6 September 2026, at 4.3 stars from 4,171 reviews. The blunt bit is its data safety card: it is the one Play app on this page that says it may collect data, and that the data cannot be deleted.

Read this first. Aves is the one exception on this page. Its Play data safety card, read 6 September 2026, says the app may collect app activity and app info and performance, that data is encrypted in transit, and that data cannot be deleted. Every other Play app here declares no data collected at all. Nothing about that is hidden or unusual for a gallery, but it is the line to read before you install.

The F-Droid build is a different package, deckers.thibault.aves.libre, so you cannot update one from the other.

  • Good: Groups photos by place and tag from the data already inside the files, by its own description
  • Good: Handles multi-page TIFFs, SVGs and old AVIs as well as the usual JPEGs and MP4s, by its own description
  • Good: Free with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label
  • Con: The only Play app here whose data safety card says it may collect data and that data cannot be deleted
  • Con: The F-Droid build is a different package, deckers.thibault.aves.libre, so you cannot switch by updating
  • Con: 4.3 stars from 4,171 reviews, a middling score from a small crowd

Back to the comparison table

KeePassDX · an offline password vault

Offline password vault, passkeys and 2FA

4.2 stars from 4,983 reviews · 500,000+ installs · free · no in-app purchases · listing updated 4 September 2026 · by Kunzisoft · Contains ads: No · checked 6 September 2026

Google Play listing · 4.2 (4,983) · read 6 September 2026

KeePassDX keeps a password database in a file you hold, and by its own description now covers passkeys and time-based 2FA codes as well. Free, no in-app purchases, no Contains ads label, and a data safety card that says no data collected, read 6 September 2026, at 4.2 stars from 4,983 reviews. The blunt bit: the free listing itself links a paid sibling app, so free is true without being the whole picture.

The no-network claim is checkable rather than a matter of trust: its listing says the app requires no Internet connection, and F-Droid publishes the full permission list for its own build, com.kunzisoft.keepass.libre, which contained no network permission when read on 2 September 2026. That is a different package from the Play build linked above, so you cannot update one from the other.

  • Good: Passkeys, time-based 2FA codes, autofill and biometric unlock, all by its own description
  • Good: Its listing says it requires no Internet connection, and the published permission list of the F-Droid build backs that
  • Good: Listing updated 4 September 2026, the newest store update on this page
  • Con: The free listing links a paid sibling, KeePassDX Pro, in its own description
  • Con: The F-Droid build is a different package, com.kunzisoft.keepass.libre, so pick a store before you put data in
  • Con: A 4.2 from 4,983 reviews, behind every other Play app here except Organic Maps and Feeder

Back to the comparison table

Feeder · RSS with no account anywhere

RSS reader, no sign-up, reads offline

3.9 stars from 2,177 reviews · 100,000+ installs · free · no in-app purchases · listing updated 30 August 2026 · by NoNonsenseApps · Contains ads: No · checked 6 September 2026

Google Play listing · 3.9 (2,177) · read 6 September 2026

Feeder is an RSS reader with no service behind it: no account, no sync backend, and articles it has already fetched read offline. Free, no in-app purchases, no Contains ads label, and a data safety card that says no data shared with third parties and no data collected, read 6 September 2026. The blunt bit: 3.9 stars from 2,177 reviews, the second lowest rating on this page, above only Organic Maps.

Its own description states that it does not sync with the usual remote backends, so no account registration of any kind is necessary (Google Play, read 6 September 2026).

On F-Droid it is published as com.nononsenseapps.feeder, a different package id from the Play build linked above, so you cannot update one from the other.

  • Good: No account and no sync backend, by its own description
  • Good: Free with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label, and its data safety card declares no data collected
  • Good: Listing updated 30 August 2026
  • Con: 3.9 stars from 2,177 reviews, the second lowest rating on this page
  • Con: The F-Droid build is a different package, com.nononsenseapps.feeder, so pick a store before you subscribe
  • Con: No sync backend also means no sync: your subscriptions live on one phone unless you export the OPML yourself

Back to the comparison table

AntennaPod · podcasts without an account

Podcast manager, downloads play offline

4.8 stars from 97,668 reviews · 1,000,000+ installs · free · no in-app purchases · listing updated 28 August 2026 · by AntennaPod Open Source Team · Contains ads: No · checked 6 September 2026

Google Play listing · 4.8 (97,668) · read 6 September 2026

AntennaPod subscribes to feeds directly, so there is no platform in the middle deciding what you can hear. Free, no in-app purchases, no Contains ads label, and a data safety card that says no data collected, read 6 September 2026, at 4.8 stars from 97,668 reviews, the largest review count on this page. The blunt bit: on the store since 2012 with 1,000,000+ installs, it is established rather than undiscovered.

Its developer puts it plainly on the listing: “AntennaPod is free in all senses of the word: open source, no costs, no ads.” (Google Play, read 6 September 2026).

Also published on F-Droid under the same package id, de.danoeh.antennapod.

  • Good: 4.8 stars from 97,668 reviews, the largest review count on this page
  • Good: Free with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label, in the developer's own words as well as on the listing
  • Good: Its data safety card declares no data collected
  • Con: On the store since 2012 with 1,000,000+ installs, so it is established rather than undiscovered
  • Con: Bring your own subscriptions: it talks to feeds directly, with no platform curation in the middle
  • Con: With 97,668 reviews behind a 4.8, the score tells you it is liked, not that it is rare

Back to the comparison table

Thunder · a Lemmy client, and the smallest pick here

Lemmy client for federated forums

4.5 stars from 198 reviews · 10,000+ installs · free · no in-app purchases · listing updated 7 January 2026 · by Hamlet Jiang Su · Contains ads: No · checked 6 September 2026

Google Play listing · 4.5 (198) · read 6 September 2026

Thunder is the only genuinely small pick on this page, a client for Lemmy at a 10,000+ install band and 4.5 stars from 198 reviews, free with no in-app purchases, no Contains ads label and a data safety card that says no data collected, read 6 September 2026. The blunt bit: its store listing was last updated 7 January 2026, the oldest on this page, and 198 reviews is too small a crowd to lean on the score.

Two details worth precision. The Play listing is titled Thunder for Lemmy and its description, read 6 September 2026, never mentions PieFed; that support is documented in the project's own repository, which is also where the newer builds live, under the thunder-app organisation: github.com/thunder-app/thunder/releases (read 8 August 2026). Google Play carries 0.8.6 from 7 January 2026 and the repository was further ahead at that read, so the two are not interchangeable sources. It is not on F-Droid at all, per the same read.

  • Good: The only pick here at a 10,000+ install band, properly obscure
  • Good: Free with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label, and its data safety card declares no data collected
  • Good: Its own description says fully free of advertisements and trackers
  • Con: Listing updated 7 January 2026, the oldest store update on this page
  • Con: 198 reviews is too small a crowd to lean on a 4.5
  • Con: The Play build is 0.8.6, and its own description calls the project still very early on in development

Back to the comparison table

Phonograph Plus · local music, F-Droid only

Plays music files stored on the phone

Not on Google Play: the package returns 404 there and a store search finds no build of it · F-Droid ships 1.12.1, added 27 March 2026 · licence GPL-3.0-only · F-Droid publishes no rating, no review count, no install count, no price and no Contains ads label, and there is no Data Safety section · source on GitHub under chr56 · F-Droid page, read 6 September 2026

F-Droid page · read 6 September 2026

Phonograph Plus plays the music files already on your phone, with nothing asking you to sign in or subscribe; its F-Droid summary reads A revived classic material designed local music player for Android. It is not on Google Play, and F-Droid publishes no rating, no review count, no install count, no price and no Contains ads label for any app, so this page prints none. Its one advertising signal is the Ads Anti-Feature flag, and the F-Droid page read 6 September 2026 lists no Anti-Features at all, which is the absence of a flag rather than a statement about the app. The blunt bit: the 1.12.1 build F-Droid ships was added on 27 March 2026 and lags the project's own releases.

It is the maintained fork by chr56, not the archived original. Upstream released version 2.0.0 on 6 July 2026 and pushed again on 6 August 2026, on the project's GitHub releases page read 8 August 2026, so the F-Droid build is behind the project rather than proof of how active it is; on the same read, the original Phonograph's archived repository showed its last commit on 24 September 2022.

  • Good: Plays local files only, with nothing to sign in to and nothing to subscribe to
  • Good: Source published under GPL-3.0-only, with an issue tracker on GitHub
  • Good: The F-Droid page read 6 September 2026 lists no Anti-Features
  • Con: Not on Google Play, so it installs through the F-Droid client or its APK
  • Con: F-Droid lags upstream here, so the version you install is not the newest the project has published
  • Con: No rating, no install count and no Data Safety section exist for it, so the trust signals Play gives you are simply absent

Back to the comparison table

Seal · video and audio downloader, F-Droid only

Downloads video or audio from a pasted link

Not on Google Play: the package returns 404 there and a store search finds no build of it · F-Droid ships 1.13.1, added 6 January 2026 · licence GPL-3.0-only · one Anti-Feature flag, Non-Free Network Services · F-Droid publishes no rating, no review count, no install count, no price and no Contains ads label, and there is no Data Safety section · source on GitHub under JunkFood02 · F-Droid page, read 6 September 2026

F-Droid page · read 6 September 2026

Seal takes a pasted link and pulls down the clip or just its audio, wrapping yt-dlp in something you can actually tap. It is not on Google Play, and F-Droid publishes no rating, no review count, no install count, no price and no Contains ads label for any app, so this page prints none. The F-Droid page read 6 September 2026 carries one Anti-Feature flag, Non-Free Network Services, with the reason given as relying on the GitHub API to check and download yt-dlp updates; it carries no Ads Anti-Feature flag, which is the absence of a flag rather than a statement about the app. The blunt bit: no stable release in well over a year, so a site that changes its player can break it and nobody may fix it quickly.

Read this first. Seal is neither abandoned nor moving. There has been no stable release since 1.13.1 on 16 October 2024, and the last activity of any kind was a 2.0.0 alpha on 29 November 2024, on the project's GitHub page read 8 August 2026; on the same read the repository was not archived and had been pushed on 25 July 2026. The F-Droid page this article links rebuilt that same 1.13.1 release on 6 January 2026, which is why the date you see there is newer than the release history suggests.

  • Good: Pulls video or just audio from a pasted link, with yt-dlp doing the work underneath
  • Good: Source published under GPL-3.0-only, with an issue tracker on GitHub
  • Good: The F-Droid page states its one Anti-Feature and the reason for it, which is more than a Play listing tells you
  • Con: No stable release since 16 October 2024, so a site that changes its player can break it and nobody may fix it quickly
  • Con: Not on Google Play, and F-Droid flags Non-Free Network Services because it relies on the GitHub API for yt-dlp updates
  • Con: No rating, no install count and no Data Safety section exist for it, so the trust signals Play gives you are simply absent

Back to the comparison table

Installing them, and the F-Droid trap

Eight of these install from Google Play in the usual way. The open source picks are also in the main F-Droid catalog, which builds and signs them itself; Phonograph Plus and Seal are F-Droid only, so that is where their links point.

A first run that avoids surprises: install one app at a time, open it, finish its first-run setup, and read the permission prompt when it appears rather than tapping through it. For anything that will hold data you care about, find the export option in settings on day one and run it once. An export you have never tested is not a backup.

One F-Droid trap. Aves, KeePassDX and Feeder are published on F-Droid under different package ids than their Play builds. Android treats a different package id as a different app, so you cannot switch from one to the other by updating. Pick the store you want before you put data in, or plan on an export and a reinstall.

Permissions and the honest downsides

Lesser known does not mean safe by default, so each app's declared data practices are in the table above, taken from its Play data safety section on 6 September 2026. Seven of the eight Play apps declare no data collected at all. Aves Gallery is the single exception and has its own note in its entry.

What each one asks for at runtime follows the same shape. Catima wants the camera, and only for scanning cards; its listing states the app has no internet access. Organic Maps asks for foreground location while you navigate, and its F-Droid permission list, read 6 September 2026, also shows network access and foreground services, so it is lean rather than permission free. KeePassDX asks for biometrics if you want to unlock with a fingerprint, and F-Droid's published permission list for its build shows no network permission at all, which is an unusually checkable claim for a password manager.

The honest drawbacks, in one place. Olauncher's text home screen is hard to love on the first day if you navigate by icon position. Seal has shipped no stable release since October 2024. Phonograph Plus on F-Droid lags its own upstream. Thunder's store listing is the oldest here. None of those are reasons to avoid the apps, but they are the things you would want told to you before you installed.

How to keep finding apps like these

The useful skill is doing this discovery yourself, long after this list goes stale. Browse F-Droid by category instead of searching, since it has no popularity ranking to fight. Follow the maintainers of apps you already like, because people who build one good small tool tend to build another. And before installing anything niche, open its issue tracker: recent commits and answered issues predict whether an app will still work next year far better than a star rating does.

Keep reading

Questions, answered

Are these rare Android apps safe to install?

All eight of the Play picks declare no data shared with third parties, and seven of the eight also declare no data collected at all, checked 6 September 2026. Aves Gallery is the exception: it declares it may collect app activity and app info and performance, and that data cannot be deleted. The two F-Droid apps have no data safety section because that section only exists on Google Play. Read the permission prompts on first run either way.

Which of these are actually free?

All ten, on the two catalogues between them. Every one of the eight Play apps here is free to install with no in-app purchases and no Contains ads label, checked 6 September 2026, and F-Droid publishes no price or ads label at all for the two apps that are not on Play. One caveat worth knowing: KeePassDX's free listing advertises a separate paid app from the same developer, so it is free without being free of any sales pitch.

Why are two of them not on Google Play?

Phonograph Plus and Seal are distributed through F-Droid instead. Both package ids return 404 on Google Play and neither appears in a store search, checked 6 September 2026. F-Droid builds and signs its apps from source, which is a different trust model from Play review, not a worse one, but it does mean updates arrive through the F-Droid client rather than the Play Store.

Do the F-Droid versions match the Play versions?

Not always, and it matters more than it sounds. Aves is published on F-Droid as a different package, deckers.thibault.aves.libre, and so are KeePassDX and Feeder. A different package id means Android treats it as a different app: you cannot update from one to the other, you have to export your data and reinstall. Thunder is the only pick here that is not on F-Droid at all.

How obscure are these apps really?

Less than the title suggests for some of them, which is why the install band is now in the table. Organic Maps sits at 5,000,000+ installs, Olauncher and AntennaPod at 1,000,000+, KeePassDX at 500,000+. Thunder at 10,000+ is the only pick that is genuinely small. All figures read on 6 September 2026.

How do you back these up before switching phones?

Catima and KeePassDX both export to a single file from their settings, and KeePassDX is a file-based vault to begin with. Feeder exports its subscription list as OPML, the standard format every reader understands. Do the export once while you only have a handful of entries, so you find out then whether it works rather than on the day you need it.

How do you keep finding apps like these?

Browse F-Droid by category rather than searching, since it has no popularity ranking pushing the same names at you. Read the issue tracker before installing something niche: an open project with recent commits and answered issues tells you more about whether it will still work next year than any star rating does.

Which of these apps is rated lowest, and does it matter?

Organic Maps, at 3.7 stars from 22,012 reviews on the listing read 6 September 2026, with Feeder next at 3.9 stars from 2,177 reviews. Both are free listings with no ads label and no in-app purchases, and neither score says anything about how rare the app is: Organic Maps has the largest install band on this page at 5,000,000+.

Checked 6 September 2026: every listing re-read. Organic Maps is the correction that matters: its listing now shows 3.7 stars from 22,012 reviews, the lowest on this page, while the table here printed 4.2 and its entry 3.9, so both are withdrawn, and the Feeder line The lowest rating on this page at 3.9 is withdrawn with them, Feeder now being second lowest. Aves Gallery's table cell also read 4.2 against a listing that shows 4.3. Review counts moved on seven listings: Catima 1,820 to 1,821, Organic Maps 21,918 to 22,012, Olauncher 80,198 to 80,516, Aves 4,168 to 4,171, KeePassDX 4,968 to 4,983, Feeder 2,169 to 2,177 and AntennaPod 97,526 to 97,668, whose entry also carried a third figure, 96,457, that matched nothing. Store update dates moved for Catima, 28 August 2026, KeePassDX, 4 September 2026, and Feeder, 30 August 2026; for Feeder the reader tool returned neither the update date nor the data safety card, and both were read off the listing page itself today. The line Installed on our own Android emulator on 18 August 2026 is withdrawn: the capture stays, described as what it shows. The KeePassDX F-Droid permission note no longer quotes the current 4.4.5 build, a version read on 2 September 2026 and not re-read today. Three sentences that talked about this page's own past rather than about the apps, Two details this page previously got loose, Two corrections to what this page said before and What we can and cannot say, are withdrawn from the entries and kept here. Seal's F-Droid page now states its one Anti-Feature flag, Non-Free Network Services, with the reason F-Droid gives. Each app now has its own card, the ten entries sit in one table with the verdict directly below it, and one FAQ item was added on the lowest rated apps.

Checked 8 August 2026: all ten entries re-read. Feeder is 3.9 stars, not the 4.0 this page printed. Aves Gallery's data safety section is now stated: it is the only app here that declares it may collect data and that data cannot be deleted. Phonograph Plus was cited at version 1.12.1 from March 2026 as proof of activity, while upstream released version 2.0.0 on 6 July 2026, and the original Phonograph's last commit is 24 September 2022 rather than "after 2020"; the unverifiable "archived in 2023" is gone. Seal is no longer called unmaintained: there has been no stable release since October 2024, but the repository is not archived and F-Droid rebuilt 1.13.1 in January 2026. KeePassDX and Feeder are published on F-Droid under different package ids than their Play builds, which this page previously flagged only for Aves. Thunder's PieFed support is sourced to the project repository, since the Play listing never mentions it, and the project has moved to the thunder-app organisation. Install counts are now printed for every Play app: Organic Maps at 5,000,000+, Olauncher and AntennaPod at 1,000,000+, so the "never heard of" framing is something you can now check rather than take on trust. The comparison that used to be an image, embedded twice with a legend describing symbols it does not use, is now a real table.

10 Rare Android Apps · Installs, Ads and Data Safety Verified